Thursday, March 23, 2006
REST EASY EVERYONE - CHARLIE IS ON THE CASE
“It is up to us to reveal the truth, we owe it to everybody’s life who was drastically altered, horrifically that day and forever. We owe it to them to uncover what happened.” - Charlie Sheen on the events of 9/11
After watching in horror as the South Tower was hit, he said to his brother (Another noted security analyst), “call me insane, but did it sorta look like those buildings came down in a controlled demolition?”
Charlie, um, did you see the planes?
I know his movie and television carrer does make him an expert on disasters, but I think it's safe to say that planes did fly into the World Trade Center - I think we can all agree on that.
Apparently Sheen doesn't buy the notion that “19 amateurs with box cutters (took) over four commercial airliners and (hit) 75 percent of their targets.”
Charlie, you shouldn't throw words like 'amateur' around, I mean we know you've spent some time with some 'pros', like Heide Fliess, but when it comes to National Security and Intelligence, I think you just might be the amateur.
“It is up to us to reveal the truth, we owe it to everybody’s life who was drastically altered, horrifically that day and forever. We owe it to them to uncover what happened.” - Charlie Sheen on the events of 9/11
After watching in horror as the South Tower was hit, he said to his brother (Another noted security analyst), “call me insane, but did it sorta look like those buildings came down in a controlled demolition?”
Charlie, um, did you see the planes?
I know his movie and television carrer does make him an expert on disasters, but I think it's safe to say that planes did fly into the World Trade Center - I think we can all agree on that.
Apparently Sheen doesn't buy the notion that “19 amateurs with box cutters (took) over four commercial airliners and (hit) 75 percent of their targets.”
Charlie, you shouldn't throw words like 'amateur' around, I mean we know you've spent some time with some 'pros', like Heide Fliess, but when it comes to National Security and Intelligence, I think you just might be the amateur.
 |
Comments:
This line made me laugh out loud, everyone around me thinks I'm crazy.
“I guess one of the perks of being president is that you get access to TV channels that don’t exist in the known universe,” the actor-turned-pseudo-intellect quipped.
If I want to know the finer points of getting "Tea Bagged" by a whore or doing lines of coke off the Arse of a stripper, I'll listen to what Chuck has to say. Until then I will be getting my information from John Stewart.
Great line about his movie and television careers making him an expert on disasters...
“I guess one of the perks of being president is that you get access to TV channels that don’t exist in the known universe,” the actor-turned-pseudo-intellect quipped.
If I want to know the finer points of getting "Tea Bagged" by a whore or doing lines of coke off the Arse of a stripper, I'll listen to what Chuck has to say. Until then I will be getting my information from John Stewart.
Great line about his movie and television careers making him an expert on disasters...
Charlie Sheen obviously watched the second installment of "Loose Change" and took it as gospel. If you want to watch it, here's the link, but it's almost an hour and a half.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=%22loose+change%22%3Cbr%3E
I'm sorry, I don't know how to make it blue. Now don't nobody start giving me crap for being a conspiracy theorist. Oddly enough, I watched it last night. I'm not saying I believe much of it. It's very crafty, but worth watching. It raises some important questions, while it makes some pretty outlandish suppositions. At one point it implies that the flight that crashed in PA actually landed in Cleveland and had on board 200 people (way more than the reported 60something)which represents the total number of people on all flights. I think they are trying to say that our government disposed of all the people who were supposed to have crashed into buildings.
They use a lot of science to back up their claims and it gives some of the theories an air of legitimacy. Of course, I'm sure they can be refuted in much the same way. I have to admit, it is troubling to me the way the towers came down. On the day, it was for a lot of people. It seemed then that there were certainly secondary explosions within the building. I remember feeling disbelief that 2 planes could do such damage. Again, I'm not saying I subscribe to anything this piece of propaganda purports, but I can't say I believe we've gotten the full story either. Watch the flick, it does put a rat in the skull.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=%22loose+change%22%3Cbr%3E
I'm sorry, I don't know how to make it blue. Now don't nobody start giving me crap for being a conspiracy theorist. Oddly enough, I watched it last night. I'm not saying I believe much of it. It's very crafty, but worth watching. It raises some important questions, while it makes some pretty outlandish suppositions. At one point it implies that the flight that crashed in PA actually landed in Cleveland and had on board 200 people (way more than the reported 60something)which represents the total number of people on all flights. I think they are trying to say that our government disposed of all the people who were supposed to have crashed into buildings.
They use a lot of science to back up their claims and it gives some of the theories an air of legitimacy. Of course, I'm sure they can be refuted in much the same way. I have to admit, it is troubling to me the way the towers came down. On the day, it was for a lot of people. It seemed then that there were certainly secondary explosions within the building. I remember feeling disbelief that 2 planes could do such damage. Again, I'm not saying I subscribe to anything this piece of propaganda purports, but I can't say I believe we've gotten the full story either. Watch the flick, it does put a rat in the skull.
One has to understand that when architects design skyscrapers, they do so with the thought that they might encounter disaster. They are designed to collapse in upon themselves. As for ancillary explosions, when an airliner collides with a building, there's goona be explosions a plenty, stuuf inside the building explodes, stuff from the plane explodes - lot's of exploding happening.
The only place I can see any room for conspiracy theory is at the Pentagon. Nobody seems to have ever seen a plane, and the cameras that line the Beltway never caught any sort of aircraft headed that way.
The fact is that Oswald acted alone. Dick Cheney just happened to be quail hunting on the grassy knoll at the time.
The only place I can see any room for conspiracy theory is at the Pentagon. Nobody seems to have ever seen a plane, and the cameras that line the Beltway never caught any sort of aircraft headed that way.
The fact is that Oswald acted alone. Dick Cheney just happened to be quail hunting on the grassy knoll at the time.
Hue, not to be pedantic, but I believe that it would be Sheen tea bagging the whore, not the other way around.
Unless we are talking she-males, in which case, never mind.
Post a Comment
Unless we are talking she-males, in which case, never mind.
